The criminal law that defines drunk and drugged driving in Georgia — and the powerful civil leverage it gives someone hurt by an impaired driver, including punitive damages that often aren’t capped. Here’s what it says, and what it means for your case.
OCGA § 40-6-391 makes it a crime to drive while impaired by alcohol or drugs, or with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or more. It’s a criminal law — but if a drunk driver hurt you, it’s also one of the strongest facts your civil case can have.
The statute defines drunk driving two different ways. The first is the “less safe” standard: you don’t need a particular number if alcohol or drugs made the person a less safe driver. The second is the “per se” standard: at 0.08% or above, the law treats you as impaired regardless of how you seemed to be handling it.
This is a criminal statute, so a violation sends the driver into the criminal system — fines, license consequences, sometimes jail. None of that puts a dollar in the hands of the person who was injured. For that, you need a separate civil claim — and that’s where this statute does heavy lifting, both to prove fault and to open the door to punitive damages.
Georgia’s statutes are public law, so here is the operative language. (We’ve kept the key provisions; the full codified version is available through the State of Georgia.)
(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any moving vehicle while:
(a)(1) Under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive;
(a)(2) Under the influence of any drug to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive;
(a)(4) Under the combined influence of any two or more such substances to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive; or
(a)(5) The person’s alcohol concentration is 0.08 grams or more at any time within three hours after such driving ended, from alcohol consumed before driving ended.
(lower limits) The per se limit is 0.02 for drivers under 21 and 0.04 for commercial drivers operating a commercial vehicle.
A driver can be guilty even if no breath or blood test was taken, or the number came back under 0.08. If alcohol, drugs, or a combination made the person less safe to drive, that is enough. In a civil case this matters because impairment can be proven with witness accounts, video, the officer’s observations, and the crash itself — not just a test result.
At 0.08% or above, the law doesn’t ask whether the person seemed impaired. The number alone establishes the violation. This is the cleanest, hardest-to-argue version of a DUI — and a high reading can also speak to how reckless the driver’s conduct was.
Not every driver gets the same 0.08 line. Drivers under 21 are over the limit at just 0.02, and commercial drivers at 0.04. A reading that would be legal for an off-duty adult can be a clear violation for a young driver or a trucker on the job.
Two things make a DUI violation especially valuable on the civil side: it can establish fault almost automatically, and it can lift the usual ceiling on punitive damages.
First, negligence per se. When a driver breaks a safety law meant to protect the public — like the DUI statute — and that violation causes the kind of harm the law was designed to prevent, the violation itself can establish negligence. Instead of arguing about whether the driver was careful, the focus shifts to the fact that they were breaking the law by driving impaired.
Second, and just as important, is punitive damages. These are damages meant to punish and deter especially dangerous conduct, on top of compensation for your losses. Georgia normally caps punitive damages at $250,000 — but that cap does not apply when the defendant was under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
Under Georgia’s punitive damages statute (OCGA § 51-12-5.1), the usual $250,000 cap is removed when the defendant acted while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In plain terms: drunk driving is one of the few situations where a Georgia jury can award punitive damages with no statutory ceiling — a major factor in the value of these cases. (Confirm the exact subsection and current wording before relying on this.)
| Without the DUI | With the DUI (§ 40-6-391) |
|---|---|
| A driver runs a red light and T-bones your car. | A driver at 0.12% BAC runs the same red light and T-bones your car. |
| You must prove the driver was careless. | The DUI can establish negligence per se — the violation does much of that work. |
| You recover compensatory damages (medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering). | You recover the same compensatory damages plus punitive damages — and the usual $250,000 cap does not apply. |
Same crash, same injuries — but the drunk driver’s violation changes both how fault is proven and how much can be recovered. That is why identifying and documenting impairment early is so important.
It isn’t. A DUI conviction punishes the driver and may order limited restitution, but it does not pay for your full medical care, lost income, or pain and suffering. Only a separate civil claim does that — and the two proceed independently.
Not true. A civil claim uses a lower standard of proof than a criminal case, and you can prove impairment even if the driver is acquitted or never charged. A conviction helps, but its absence does not end your claim.
Generally yes — but drunk driving is a recognized exception. When the at-fault driver was under the influence, Georgia removes that cap, which can significantly increase what a jury may award.
This page explains Georgia law in general terms and is not legal advice; reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutory text is summarized for readability — consult the official Georgia Code for the complete, authoritative version. Whether punitive damages and negligence per se apply depends on the specific facts, so speak with a licensed Georgia attorney about your situation.
Hit by a drunk driver?
DUI crashes can carry damages ordinary claims don’t — see what your case may be worth. Free, confidential, and no obligation.
A drunk-driving crash isn’t an accident — it’s a choice someone made. Kyle Koester holds impaired drivers fully accountable, including the punitive damages the law allows. Free, confidential, and no fee unless he wins.